Compare Concrete5 vs. Contenta

Concrete5 Contenta
Logo
Product intro

Concrete 5 is a long running content management system. It is known for it's user friendly interface and with it's recent iterations has moved to adopt Symfony components.

Contenta is a Drupal 8 distribution that aims to provide a headless, decoupled shell for Drupal 8.

Main advantages
  • Ease of use
  • Extensions marketplace
  • Reasonably sized community
  • Open Source
  • Built on a solid Drupal 8 foundation
  • Fully customisable
Main disvantages
  • Product versioning can be confusing
  • Not many examples for complex implementations
  • Multilingual architecture not top notch
  • Dependence on other projects
  • Hosting complexity
  • Limited templating capability
Product detailsConcrete5 Contenta

CMSes vailable for comparison: BackBee, Bolt CMS, Concrete5, Contenta, Contentful, Cosmic.js, Craft CMS, Drupal 8, eZ Platform, Fork CMS, GraphCMS, Grav, Jarves, Joomla!, Kunstmaan, October CMS, Open Orchestra, Pagekit, Pimcore, PyroCMS 3, Reservoir, Spress, Sulu CMS, Symfony CMF, Symphony CMS

Selected articles