Compare Concrete5 vs. Thunder CMS

Concrete5 Thunder CMS
Logo
Product intro

Concrete 5 is a long running content management system. It is known for it's user friendly interface and with it's recent iterations has moved to adopt Symfony components.

Thunder is a Drupal 8 distribution specialised for media houses. It is initially developed by Burda, a German media company, who is now seeking to get other members on the project.

Main advantages
  • Ease of use
  • Extensions marketplace
  • Reasonably sized community
  • Everything included
  • Relatively modern architecture
  • Easy to get started
Main disvantages
  • Product versioning can be confusing
  • Not many examples for complex implementations
  • Multilingual architecture not top notch
  • Coupling on pre-packaged product
  • One size fits all - a lot of choices have been made
  • Unsure future with being a new distribution
Product detailsConcrete5 Thunder CMS

CMSes vailable for comparison: BackBee, Bolt CMS, Concrete5, Contenta, Contentful, Cosmic.js, Craft CMS, Drupal 8, eZ Platform, Fork CMS, GraphCMS, Grav, Jarves, Joomla!, Kunstmaan, October CMS, Open Orchestra, Pagekit, Pimcore, PyroCMS 3, Reservoir, Spress, Sulu CMS, Symfony CMF, Symphony CMS