Compare Contentful vs. Sulu CMS

Contentful Sulu CMS
Logo
Product intro

Contentful is a pure CaaS (Content as a Service) player. It comes from Berlin, and is currently the global market leader for decoupled hosted content management.

Sulu is a new take on content management. It has been started from scratch using an existing content repository.

Main advantages
  • Widely used across industries
  • No technical operations needed
  • Free tier for hobbyists
  • Clean architecture based on Full Symfony Full Stack Framework
  • Uses ready made components such as CMF, PHPCR
  • Clean user interface
Main disvantages
  • Limited customisation capabilities
  • Vendor lock in (though export is possible)
  • Pricing for large amounts of content
  • Limited adoption
  • A new product, there are use cases not covered yet
  • Initial setup and flexibility requires expert developers
Product detailsContentful Sulu CMS

CMSes vailable for comparison: BackBee, Bolt CMS, Concrete5, Contenta, Contentful, Cosmic.js, Craft CMS, Drupal 8, eZ Platform, Fork CMS, GraphCMS, Grav, Jarves, Joomla!, Kunstmaan, October CMS, Open Orchestra, Pagekit, Pimcore, PyroCMS 3, Reservoir, Spress, Sulu CMS, Symfony CMF, Symphony CMS