Compare Cosmic.js vs. Concrete5

Cosmic.js Concrete5
Logo
Product intro

Cosmic.js is a CaaS based on GraphQL. It follows on the footsteps of both Contentful and GraphCMS.

Concrete 5 is a long running content management system. It is known for it's user friendly interface and with it's recent iterations has moved to adopt Symfony components.

Main advantages
  • Excellent usability for editors
  • Developer ergonomics
  • Clear pricing model (no free tier, though)
  • Ease of use
  • Extensions marketplace
  • Reasonably sized community
Main disvantages
  • Limited content modeling capability
  • Lack of customisation options
  • Vendor lock in
  • Product versioning can be confusing
  • Not many examples for complex implementations
  • Multilingual architecture not top notch
Product detailsCosmic.js Concrete5

CMSes vailable for comparison: BackBee, Bolt CMS, Concrete5, Contenta, Contentful, Cosmic.js, Craft CMS, Drupal 8, eZ Platform, Fork CMS, GraphCMS, Grav, Jarves, Joomla!, Kunstmaan, October CMS, Open Orchestra, Pagekit, Pimcore, PyroCMS 3, Reservoir, Spress, Sulu CMS, Symfony CMF, Symphony CMS