Compare Cosmic.js vs. Sulu CMS

Cosmic.js Sulu CMS
Logo
Product intro

Cosmic.js is a CaaS based on GraphQL. It follows on the footsteps of both Contentful and GraphCMS.

Sulu is a new take on content management. It has been started from scratch using an existing content repository.

Main advantages
  • Excellent usability for editors
  • Developer ergonomics
  • Clear pricing model (no free tier, though)
  • Clean architecture based on Full Symfony Full Stack Framework
  • Uses ready made components such as CMF, PHPCR
  • Clean user interface
Main disvantages
  • Limited content modeling capability
  • Lack of customisation options
  • Vendor lock in
  • Limited adoption
  • A new product, there are use cases not covered yet
  • Initial setup and flexibility requires expert developers
Product detailsCosmic.js Sulu CMS

CMSes vailable for comparison: BackBee, Bolt CMS, Concrete5, Contenta, Contentful, Cosmic.js, Craft CMS, Drupal 8, eZ Platform, Fork CMS, GraphCMS, Grav, Jarves, Joomla!, Kunstmaan, October CMS, Open Orchestra, Pagekit, Pimcore, PyroCMS 3, Reservoir, Spress, Sulu CMS, Symfony CMF, Symphony CMS