Compare Cosmic.js vs. Thunder CMS

Cosmic.js Thunder CMS
Logo
Product intro

Cosmic.js is a CaaS based on GraphQL. It follows on the footsteps of both Contentful and GraphCMS.

Thunder is a Drupal 8 distribution specialised for media houses. It is initially developed by Burda, a German media company, who is now seeking to get other members on the project.

Main advantages
  • Excellent usability for editors
  • Developer ergonomics
  • Clear pricing model (no free tier, though)
  • Everything included
  • Relatively modern architecture
  • Easy to get started
Main disvantages
  • Limited content modeling capability
  • Lack of customisation options
  • Vendor lock in
  • Coupling on pre-packaged product
  • One size fits all - a lot of choices have been made
  • Unsure future with being a new distribution
Product detailsCosmic.js Thunder CMS

CMSes vailable for comparison: BackBee, Bolt CMS, Concrete5, Contenta, Contentful, Cosmic.js, Craft CMS, Drupal 8, eZ Platform, Fork CMS, GraphCMS, Grav, Jarves, Joomla!, Kunstmaan, October CMS, Open Orchestra, Pagekit, Pimcore, PyroCMS 3, Reservoir, Spress, Sulu CMS, Symfony CMF, Symphony CMS