Compare Fork CMS vs. Contenta

Fork CMS Contenta
Logo
Product intro

Fork CMS is a new take on PHP CMSes. Built on a contemporary base that is a customised version of the Symfony2 framework, this is a challenger to keep note of.

Contenta is a Drupal 8 distribution that aims to provide a headless, decoupled shell for Drupal 8.

Main advantages
  • A fresh start, no legacy baggage
  • A clean user interface
  • Fully featured for marketing sites
  • Open Source
  • Built on a solid Drupal 8 foundation
  • Fully customisable
Main disvantages
  • Not a 100% standard Symfony Framework app
  • Limited adoption
  • Public REST APIs not a priority
  • Dependence on other projects
  • Hosting complexity
  • Limited templating capability
Product detailsFork CMS Contenta

CMSes vailable for comparison: BackBee, Bolt CMS, Concrete5, Contenta, Contentful, Cosmic.js, Craft CMS, Drupal 8, eZ Platform, Fork CMS, GraphCMS, Grav, Jarves, Joomla!, Kunstmaan, October CMS, Open Orchestra, Pagekit, Pimcore, PyroCMS 3, Reservoir, Spress, Sulu CMS, Symfony CMF, Symphony CMS