Compare Fork CMS vs. Thunder CMS

Fork CMS Thunder CMS
Logo
Product intro

Fork CMS is a new take on PHP CMSes. Built on a contemporary base that is a customised version of the Symfony2 framework, this is a challenger to keep note of.

Thunder is a Drupal 8 distribution specialised for media houses. It is initially developed by Burda, a German media company, who is now seeking to get other members on the project.

Main advantages
  • A fresh start, no legacy baggage
  • A clean user interface
  • Fully featured for marketing sites
  • Everything included
  • Relatively modern architecture
  • Easy to get started
Main disvantages
  • Not a 100% standard Symfony Framework app
  • Limited adoption
  • Public REST APIs not a priority
  • Coupling on pre-packaged product
  • One size fits all - a lot of choices have been made
  • Unsure future with being a new distribution
Product detailsFork CMS Thunder CMS

CMSes vailable for comparison: BackBee, Bolt CMS, Concrete5, Contenta, Contentful, Cosmic.js, Craft CMS, Drupal 8, eZ Platform, Fork CMS, GraphCMS, Grav, Jarves, Joomla!, Kunstmaan, October CMS, Open Orchestra, Pagekit, Pimcore, PyroCMS 3, Reservoir, Spress, Sulu CMS, Symfony CMF, Symphony CMS