Compare Kunstmaan vs. Contenta

Kunstmaan Contenta
Logo
Product intro

Kunstmaan Agency has created a number of Symfony2 Framework Bundles to enable developers to create web applications with CMS features. It's not a complete product in itself, but offers flexibility for skilled developers to create easy to use site experiences for content creators.

Contenta is a Drupal 8 distribution that aims to provide a headless, decoupled shell for Drupal 8.

Main advantages
  • Flexible, choose only what you need and adjust to your needs
  • Uses standard Symfony Framework structure and development practises
  • Can be integrated into existing Symfony2 applications
  • Open Source
  • Built on a solid Drupal 8 foundation
  • Fully customisable
Main disvantages
  • Limited adoption outside of Kunstmaan
  • A bit hard to purchase, because it's a collection of components rather than a complete product
  • Future roadmap a questionmark
  • Dependence on other projects
  • Hosting complexity
  • Limited templating capability
Product detailsKunstmaan Contenta

CMSes vailable for comparison: BackBee, Bolt CMS, Concrete5, Contenta, Contentful, Cosmic.js, Craft CMS, Drupal 8, eZ Platform, Fork CMS, GraphCMS, Grav, Jarves, Joomla!, Kunstmaan, October CMS, Open Orchestra, Pagekit, Pimcore, PyroCMS 3, Reservoir, Spress, Sulu CMS, Symfony CMF, Symphony CMS