Compare Pimcore vs. Fork CMS

Pimcore Fork CMS
Logo
Product intro

Pimcore is a CMS whose development started in 2009. Originally the Content Management System was built on the Zend PHP Framework, but the system will switch to the Symfony full stack framework.

Fork CMS is a new take on PHP CMSes. Built on a contemporary base that is a customised version of the Symfony2 framework, this is a challenger to keep note of.

Main advantages
  • Solid feature set beyond regular CMS features
  • Commercial backing
  • Quality codebase
  • A fresh start, no legacy baggage
  • A clean user interface
  • Fully featured for marketing sites
Main disvantages
  • New product version can be risky
  • Limited adoption
  • Can be too "heavy" for simple sites
  • Not a 100% standard Symfony Framework app
  • Limited adoption
  • Public REST APIs not a priority
Product detailsPimcore Fork CMS

CMSes vailable for comparison: BackBee, Bolt CMS, Concrete5, Contenta, Contentful, Cosmic.js, Craft CMS, Drupal 8, eZ Platform, Fork CMS, GraphCMS, Grav, Jarves, Joomla!, Kunstmaan, October CMS, Open Orchestra, Pagekit, Pimcore, PyroCMS 3, Reservoir, Spress, Sulu CMS, Symfony CMF, Symphony CMS