Compare Sulu CMS vs. Fork CMS

Sulu CMS Fork CMS
Logo
Product intro

Sulu is a new take on content management. It has been started from scratch using an existing content repository.

Fork CMS is a new take on PHP CMSes. Built on a contemporary base that is a customised version of the Symfony2 framework, this is a challenger to keep note of.

Main advantages
  • Clean architecture based on Full Symfony Full Stack Framework
  • Uses ready made components such as CMF, PHPCR
  • Clean user interface
  • A fresh start, no legacy baggage
  • A clean user interface
  • Fully featured for marketing sites
Main disvantages
  • Limited adoption
  • A new product, there are use cases not covered yet
  • Initial setup and flexibility requires expert developers
  • Not a 100% standard Symfony Framework app
  • Limited adoption
  • Public REST APIs not a priority
Product detailsSulu CMS Fork CMS

CMSes vailable for comparison: BackBee, Bolt CMS, Concrete5, Contenta, Contentful, Cosmic.js, Craft CMS, Drupal 8, eZ Platform, Fork CMS, GraphCMS, Grav, Jarves, Joomla!, Kunstmaan, October CMS, Open Orchestra, Pagekit, Pimcore, PyroCMS 3, Reservoir, Spress, Sulu CMS, Symfony CMF, Symphony CMS