Compare Sulu CMS vs. Thunder CMS

Sulu CMS Thunder CMS
Logo
Product intro

Sulu is a new take on content management. It has been started from scratch using an existing content repository.

Thunder is a Drupal 8 distribution specialised for media houses. It is initially developed by Burda, a German media company, who is now seeking to get other members on the project.

Main advantages
  • Clean architecture based on Full Symfony Full Stack Framework
  • Uses ready made components such as CMF, PHPCR
  • Clean user interface
  • Everything included
  • Relatively modern architecture
  • Easy to get started
Main disvantages
  • Limited adoption
  • A new product, there are use cases not covered yet
  • Initial setup and flexibility requires expert developers
  • Coupling on pre-packaged product
  • One size fits all - a lot of choices have been made
  • Unsure future with being a new distribution
Product detailsSulu CMS Thunder CMS

CMSes vailable for comparison: BackBee, Bolt CMS, Concrete5, Contenta, Contentful, Cosmic.js, Craft CMS, Drupal 8, eZ Platform, Fork CMS, GraphCMS, Grav, Jarves, Joomla!, Kunstmaan, October CMS, Open Orchestra, Pagekit, Pimcore, PyroCMS 3, Reservoir, Spress, Sulu CMS, Symfony CMF, Symphony CMS