Compare Symfony CMF vs. Sulu CMS

Symfony CMF Sulu CMS
Logo
Product intro

As a Content Management Framework Symfony CMF is not a complete CMS product, but more of a framework to build your own CMS on top of. This makes it stand out from the crowd.

Sulu is a new take on content management. It has been started from scratch using an existing content repository.

Main advantages
  • Full stack Symfony Framework Implementation
  • Flexibility in design alowing tailored experiences
  • Can be embedded into existing Symfony applications
  • Clean architecture based on Full Symfony Full Stack Framework
  • Uses ready made components such as CMF, PHPCR
  • Clean user interface
Main disvantages
  • Longer time to market than with CMS
  • Content editor experience easily compromised
  • Smaller community than CMSes
  • Limited adoption
  • A new product, there are use cases not covered yet
  • Initial setup and flexibility requires expert developers
Product detailsSymfony CMF Sulu CMS

CMSes vailable for comparison: BackBee, Bolt CMS, Concrete5, Contenta, Contentful, Cosmic.js, Craft CMS, Drupal 8, eZ Platform, Fork CMS, GraphCMS, Grav, Jarves, Joomla!, Kunstmaan, October CMS, Open Orchestra, Pagekit, Pimcore, PyroCMS 3, Reservoir, Spress, Sulu CMS, Symfony CMF, Symphony CMS