Compare Thunder CMS vs. Fork CMS

Thunder CMS Fork CMS
Logo
Product intro

Thunder is a Drupal 8 distribution specialised for media houses. It is initially developed by Burda, a German media company, who is now seeking to get other members on the project.

Fork CMS is a new take on PHP CMSes. Built on a contemporary base that is a customised version of the Symfony2 framework, this is a challenger to keep note of.

Main advantages
  • Everything included
  • Relatively modern architecture
  • Easy to get started
  • A fresh start, no legacy baggage
  • A clean user interface
  • Fully featured for marketing sites
Main disvantages
  • Coupling on pre-packaged product
  • One size fits all - a lot of choices have been made
  • Unsure future with being a new distribution
  • Not a 100% standard Symfony Framework app
  • Limited adoption
  • Public REST APIs not a priority
Product detailsThunder CMS Fork CMS

CMSes vailable for comparison: BackBee, Bolt CMS, Concrete5, Contenta, Contentful, Cosmic.js, Craft CMS, Drupal 8, eZ Platform, Fork CMS, GraphCMS, Grav, Jarves, Joomla!, Kunstmaan, October CMS, Open Orchestra, Pagekit, Pimcore, PyroCMS 3, Reservoir, Spress, Sulu CMS, Symfony CMF, Symphony CMS